{"id":445,"date":"2011-04-19T17:59:03","date_gmt":"2011-04-19T15:59:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/?p=445"},"modified":"2025-01-21T15:00:06","modified_gmt":"2025-01-21T13:00:06","slug":"an-interesting-dialogue-with-a-ghair-muqallid-regarding-the-muqtadee-reciting-behind-the-imaam-in-salaah","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/?p=445","title":{"rendered":"An interesting dialogue with a Ghair Muqallid regarding the Muqtadee reciting behind the Imaam in Salaah"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hadhrat Mufti Mahmood Gangohi <em>(Rahmatullahi Alaih)<\/em> was conducting a Bukhari Shareef lesson in Kanpur when a person entered and posed a question which was totally unrelated to the lesson.\u00a0Nevertheless the following discussion ensued between Hadhrat Mufti Saheb and the Ghair Muqallid:<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqallid:<\/strong> What is your personal opinion regarding the <em>mas\u2019ala<\/em> of <em>Qiraat Khalfal Imaam<\/em> (the <em>muqtadee<\/em> reciting behind the Imaam in <em>Salaah<\/em>)?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> I will answer once you inform me which <em>mazhab<\/em> you subscribe to.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqallid:<\/strong> I am an <em>Ahle-Hadith<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> Now you may present your question.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqallid:<\/strong> What is your personal opinion regarding the <em>mas\u2019ala<\/em> of <em>Qiraat Khalfal Imaam<\/em> (the <em>muqtadee<\/em> reciting behind the <em>Imaam<\/em> in <em>Salaah<\/em>)?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> Your question is quite disturbing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqallid:<\/strong> It is strange that a mere question could disturb someone.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> Certainly! It is for this reason the Qur\u2019an has forbade us from posing certain questions. Does the Qur\u2019an not command us:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/Surah_Maidah_5_1011.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-451\" title=\"Surah_Maidah_5_101\" src=\"http:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/Surah_Maidah_5_1011.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"388\" height=\"42\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/Surah_Maidah_5_1011.png 388w, https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/Surah_Maidah_5_1011-300x32.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 388px) 100vw, 388px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u201c<em>O You who believe! Do not pose such questions which, if explained to you, will cause you pain.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqallid:<\/strong> And may I ask in which way did my question disturb you?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> I am disturbed on account of the fact that you are enquiring about my personal opinion in this issue. Are you going to go by whatever I say? You ought to be asking what the <em>Hadith<\/em> has to say regarding this <em>mas\u2019ala<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ghair Muqallid:<\/strong> Yes! That is exactly what I meant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> <em>Al-Hamdulillah<\/em>! Your inner condition reveals that you consider whatever I am going to tell you to be in accordance to that which appears in the <em>Hadith<\/em> (for this reason you have inquired from me regarding my personal opinion). Now that you have understood this, listen attentively! It is not compulsory for the <em>muqtadi <\/em>to recite behind the <em>Imaam<\/em> in <em>Salaah<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ghair Muqallid:<\/strong> Will you present to me your proof for saying it is not compulsory for the <em>muqtadi<\/em> to recite behind the <em>Imaam?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> Once again you have disturbed me through your question.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> How is that?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> You claim to be an <em>Ahle-Hadith<\/em> (a follower of the <em>Hadith<\/em>) whereas in this situation you have abandoned the teachings of the <em>Hadith<\/em>. The <em>Hadith<\/em> instructs the claimant to furnish proof not the defendant. Since you are claiming that it is compulsory for the <em>muqtadi <\/em>to recite behind the <em>Imaam<\/em> in <em>Salaah<\/em>, it is your duty to furnish the proof:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0646\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0639\u064a<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nabi <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em> said: It is the duty of the claimant to produce proof in substantiation of his claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hafiz Ibnus Salaah in his \u201c<em>Muqaddamah<\/em>\u201d has categorically stated that this <em>Hadith <\/em>is a <em>mashhoor Hadith<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I am not the one who claims that it is compulsory for the <em>muqtadee <\/em>to recite behind the <em>Imaam<\/em>. Instead, it is you. Despite that, you still demand proof from me and act contrary to this <em>Hadith<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0646\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0639\u064a<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nabi <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em> said: It is the duty of the claimant to produce proof in substantiation of his claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Certainly this is not what is expected from a person who claims to be Ahle-e-Hadith (a follower of the <em>Hadith<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nevertheless, I will still explain to you (why reciting behind the <em>Imaam <\/em>is not compulsory). To prove compulsion, one needs an absolutely authentic proof  known in <em>Shari&#8217;ah <\/em>as (\u0646\u0635 \u0642\u0637\u0639\u0649).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In our case, the proof i.e. the Hadith which establishes reciting behind the Imaam is not an absolutely authentic proof (nass-e-Qati).<!--more--><\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> Here\u2019s my proof \u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0644\u0627 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u0629 \u0644\u0645\u0646 \u0644\u0645 \u064a\u0642\u0631\u0627 \u0628\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>There is no Salaah for he who did not rea<\/em><em>d Surah Faatiha.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> Inform me, in which <em>juz <\/em>of the Qur\u2019an does this appear? In which <em>Surah <\/em>does this verse appear? Certainly this is no verse of the Qur&#8217;an. Instead this is a <em>Hadith <\/em>which falls under the category of <em>khabrul waahid.<\/em> Don\u2019t you even know the meaning of an absolutely authentic proof? (\u062f\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0642\u0637\u0639\u064a)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nevertheless since you have presented this <em>Hadith<\/em>, can you please explain how you have concluded from this <em>Hadith <\/em>that it is compulsory to recite behind he <em>Imaam<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For a long time I have been waiting to ask the <em>Ahle-Hadith <\/em>how do they conclude from this <em>Hadith <\/em>that it is compulsory for the <em>muqtadi <\/em>to recite <em>Surah Faatihah<\/em>. Consider the narration of Hadhrat Ubadah bin Saaamit <em>(Radiyallahu Anhu)<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOnce, after the completion of the Salaah, Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em> enquired from the Sahaba <em>(Radiyallahu Anhum) <\/em>as to who among them were reciting during the <em>Salaah<\/em>. Rasullullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em> said:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0643\u0645 \u062a\u0642\u0631\u0624\u0648\u0646 \u062e\u0644\u0641 \u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645\u0643\u0645<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>It seems that you are reciting behind your Imaam<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">From this <em>Hadith<\/em> we understand that reciting behind the <em>Imaam <\/em>was not a command of Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>. Similarly, we come to know that reciting behind the <em>Imaam <\/em>was not a common practice during the era of Rasullullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Had this been the common practice of Sahabah or the command of Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>, Nabi <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>would have not enquired from them whether they were reciting behind the <em>Imaam<\/em>. Furthermore, had this been the instruction of Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>, the companions of Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>would have replied:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOh our master <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>, as per your instruction we are reciting behind the <em>Imaam<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is for this very reason, we do not find that the prophet <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>ever questioned the <em>Sahabah <\/em>whether they recited <em>&#8216;subhana rabbiyal azeem&#8217;<\/em> in <em>ruku<\/em>, <em>&#8216;subhana rabbiyal a\u2019ala&#8217;<\/em> in <em>sajda <\/em>or <em>attihiyaat<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Why didn\u2019t Nabi <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>ask regarding these aspects? This is due to the fact that this was the general practice of the Sahabah <em>(Radiyallahu Anhum)<\/em> which everyone was carrying out as per the instruction of Nabi <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>However, in the case of reading behind the <em>Imaam<\/em>, the question was posed: \u201cWho from amongst you were reciting behind me in <em>Salaah<\/em>?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Some of the Sahabah <em>(Radiyallahu Anhum) <\/em>then timorously answered: \u201cWe were reciting behind you O Nabi <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>! Nabi <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>then said:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDo not recite anything (behind your <em>Imaam<\/em>) with the exception of <em>Surah Faatiha<\/em>, for there is no <em>Salaah <\/em>for the one who does not recite <em>Surah Faatiha <\/em>\u2026 (<em>Bazlul Majhood<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> \u201c\u2026 You see! This is exactly what I mentioned to you!\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cCertainly! But, allow me to explain to you the correct meaning of this <em>Hadith<\/em>. On one hand Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em> prohibits reciting behind the <em>Imaam <\/em>through the following words: \u0644\u0627 \u062a\u0642\u0631\u0621\u0648\u0627 (do not recite behind the <em>Imaam<\/em>!) and on the other hand Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>makes an exclusion by saying \u0625\u0644\u0627 (except for\u2026). (So we have a prohibition together with an exclusion.) Thus the prohibition denotes impermissibility whilst the exclusion denotes permissibility. Definitely we understand that Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>,will not prevent you from doing a certain thing and at the same time allow you to do that very  same thing. So could you explain to me which thing is Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>preventing us from and which thing is Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>allowing us to do. If we are being allowed to recite <em>Surah Faatiha <\/em>(behind the <em>Imaam<\/em>), then what are we being prohibited from?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid<\/strong>: \u201cEverything besides <em>Surah Faathihah <\/em>will be left under the prohibition. In actual fact, what I mean is that the <em>Hadith <\/em>is stopping us from reciting anything (i.e. <em>Surah<\/em>) after <em>Surah Faatiha <\/em>like reading some other verse or like joining another <em>Surah <\/em>to <em>Surah Faatiha<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb<\/strong>: \u201cVery well. Let us make <em>i\u2019itibaar<\/em> of this <em>Hadith<\/em>. Are you familiar with the terminology of the <em>Muhaditheen<\/em> when they mention <em>i\u2019itibaar<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid<\/strong>: \u201cCertainly I am familiar with this terminology. <em>I\u2019itibaar<\/em> means to accept and acknowledge something.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> NO! This is not what <em>i\u2019itibaar <\/em>means. According to the <em>Muhadditheen,<\/em> <em>i\u2019itibaar<\/em> means to carry out a comprehensive study in order to gather the various chains of a certain <em>Hadith <\/em>which are recorded in the books of <em>Hadith<\/em>. The purpose for carrying out this study is so that one may be able to keep before him the various texts of the same <em>Hadith<\/em> and pass a correct judgement. Now, making <em>i\u2019itibaar <\/em>of this <em>Hadith<\/em>, we find different wordings appearing in different <em>Ahaadith<\/em>. The following text appears in one <em>Hadith<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0644\u0627 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u0629 \u0644\u0645\u0646 \u0644\u0645 \u064a\u0642\u0631\u0623 \u0628\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0641\u0635\u0627\u0639\u062f\u0627<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>There is no Salaah for the one who does not recite Surah Faatiha and something else (over and above Surah Faatiha)<\/em><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In another text it appears:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0641\u0645\u0627 \u0632\u0627\u062f<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>There is no Salaah for the one who does not recite Surah Faati<\/em><em>ha and something additional<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In yet another text it appears:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0648\u0645\u0627 \u062a\u064a\u0633\u064e\u0651\u0631<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>There is no Salaah for the one who does not recite Surah Faatiha and <\/em><em>whatever else you find easy to recite.<\/em><\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">Another text reads:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0648\u0633\u0648\u0631\u0629 \u0645\u0639\u0647\u0627<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>There is no Salaah for the one who does not <\/em><em>recite Surah Faatiha coupled with another Surah.<\/em><\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">Yet another text reads:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\" lang=\"en-ZA\">\u0648\u0622\u064a\u062a\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0639\u0647\u0627<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>There is no Salaah for the one who does not recite Surah Faatiha and two more verses.<\/em><\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Keeping all these texts before us, we understand that it is permissible for one to recite more than <em>Surah Faatiha<\/em>. Now, you explain to me if this is the case, then what exactly are we not supposed to recite behind the <em>Imaam<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If you have any reservations regarding the authenticity of these texts, I will show it to you from the original works.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb<\/strong> <strong>continued: <\/strong>\u201cLet us leave these questions to be answered by the learned scholars. I wish to ask you another <em>mas\u2019ala<\/em>. Tell me, if you entered the <em>Masjid <\/em>whilst the <em>Imaam <\/em>is in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>, what will you do? Will you join him in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em> or not?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If you don\u2019t join him then you (being an Ahle-Hadith) will be abandoning the <em>Hadith <\/em>which says: \u2018Join the <em>Imaam <\/em>in whichever posture you find him in\u2019 (Musannaf Abdur Razzaaq 2\/281)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">And if you do join him in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>, then what about your <em>Surah Faatiha<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">You could recite it in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>, but then you will be contradicting the <em>Hadith <\/em>which prohibits reciting Qur\u2019an in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em> (Nasai).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">You could do as some of the Ahle-Hadith do i.e. despite them joining the <em>Imaam <\/em>in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>, they repeat the <em>rakaat <\/em>after the <em>Imaam <\/em>makes <em>salaam<\/em>. If you do accordingly, you will be abandoning the <em>Hadith <\/em>wherein Rasulullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) <\/em>said: \u201cWho joins the <em>Imaam <\/em>in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em> has got the <em>rakaat<\/em>. (Bazlul Majhood)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Now tell me, how can one call himself an Ahle-Hadith when he has ignored all these <em>Ahaadith <\/em>of Rasullullah <em>(Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)<\/em>? In fact (from the <em>Ahaadith <\/em>mentioned) he has not practised on a single <em>Hadith<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> How do I come out of this problem? I am cornered from all sides.<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cWhat a simpleton you are! After I have cornered you from all sides, you are asking me for a way out.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> \u201cIf you had found the <em>Imaam <\/em>in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>, what would you do?\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cWhy are you now referring to me? Has your stock of <em>Ahaadith <\/em>depleated? And if I do tell you, will you go by what I say?\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> <em>(Silent)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cIf I do tell you, will you promise to adopt <em>taqleed <\/em>as we do?\u201d<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> \u201cPlease don\u2019t entangle me with your arguments.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cYou have become so entangled, as if there is no way out of it. As for me, I would simply refer the matter to Hadhrat <em>Imaam <\/em>Abu Hanifa. I would go up to him and say: \u201cHadhrat! I am cornered from all sides, please show me a way out.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Imaam Abu Hanifa would say:  \u201cSon! The <em>Hadith <\/em>is explicit: \u201cIn whichever posture you find the <em>Imaam<\/em>, join him.\u201d Son! Follow the <em>Hadith <\/em>and go directly into <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>, for it is impermissible to contradict the <em>Hadith<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, understand O my son! The <em>Hadith <\/em>has prohibited us from reciting Qur\u2019an during <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>. Hence do not recite <em>Surah Faatiha <\/em>in the state of <em>ruku&#8217;<\/em>, for indeed it is a grave offence to contradict the <em>Hadith<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>And my dear son! The <em>Hadith <\/em>says: Who joins the <em>Imaam <\/em>in <em>ruku\u2019<\/em>, has got the <em>rakaat<\/em>. So regard that <em>rakaat <\/em>as counted and do not repeat it. Otherwise you will be committing a serious crime by ignoring the <em>Hadith<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I will then enquire: \u201cO Imam Saheb! What about the <em>Hadith<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0644\u0627 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u0629 \u0644\u0645\u0646 \u0644\u0645 \u064a\u0642\u0631\u0623 \u0628\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><em>There is no Salaah for he who does not recite Surah Faatiha.<\/em><\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">Imam Abu Hanifa would reply:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSon! This <em>Hadith <\/em>refers to the one who is not behind an <em>Imaam<\/em>, e.g. someone who is performing <em>Salaah<\/em> alone or this <em>Hadith<\/em> refers to the <em>Imaam <\/em>himself.<\/p>\n<p>If the <em>Imaam <\/em>or the one performing <em>Salaah<\/em> alone does not recite <em>Surah Faatiha<\/em>, the <em>Salaah <\/em>will not be complete.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As for the one following the <em>Imaam<\/em>, then there are other <em>Ahaadith <\/em>relating to him. For example the narration which says:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0625\u0630\u0627 \u0642\u0631\u0623 \u0641\u0623\u0646\u0635\u062a\u0648\u0627<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><em>When the Imaam recites then remain silent. (Muslim)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0645\u0646 \u0643\u0627\u0646 \u0644\u0647 \u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0641\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0644\u0647 \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><em>Who has an Imaam, the recitation of his  Imaam will be sufficient for him (Hence there is no need for him to recite anything behind the Imaam). (Tabraani, Dara Qutni, Ibne Majah \u2026 See Bazlul Majhood)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0627\u0644\u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0636\u0627\u0645\u0646<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><em>The Imaam is made responsible for the entire congregation. (Tirmizi)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>After all, there must be something which the <em>Imaam <\/em>has taken responsibility of.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> The narrator of that <em>Hadith <\/em>is a <em>kazzaab <\/em>(liar).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u0625\u0630\u0627 \u0642\u0631\u0623 \u0641\u0623\u0646\u0635\u062a\u0648\u0627<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><em>When the Imaam recites then remain silent. (Muslim)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This Hadith is a <em>Hadith <\/em>narrated by Imaam Muslim in Muslim Shareef. How dare you find fault with the narrator?<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">Anyway, who is this narrator? Let me make a note of him. Who knows, he might appear in one of your proofs and I will use it against you.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> There\u2019s nothing wrong with this <em>Hadith<\/em>. I was referring to the other <em>Hadith<\/em> which says:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\" lang=\"en-ZA\">\u0645\u0646 \u0643\u0627\u0646 \u0644\u0647 \u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0641\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0644\u0647 \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><em>Who has an Imaam, the recitation of his  Imaam will be sufficient for him (Hence there is no need for him to recite anything behind the Imaam). (Tabraani, Dara Qutni, Ibne Majah \u2026 See Bazlul Majhood)<\/em><\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">In this narration there is a <em>kazzaab <\/em>(liar).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cAnd who is this <em>kazzaab narrator<\/em>?\u201d<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> \u201cJaabir Ju&#8217;fi\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cAnd which <em>Muhaddith<\/em> ruled Jaabir Jufi as a <em>kazzaab<\/em>?\u201d<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> \u201cAbu Hanifa\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat<\/strong><strong> Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> Subhanallah! You mean you are actually relying upon what our Imaam Abu Hanifa said regarding a narrator of <em>Hadith<\/em>! This is fantastic. For years people have been saying Abu Hanifa does not know <em>Hadith<\/em>. Today, it pleases me to hear from your mouth that Imaam Abu Hanifa was well acquainted with <em>Hadith<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, from your statement we also learn that Imaam Abu Hanifa must have written a book on <em>Hadith <\/em>in which he discussed at length the narrators of <em>Hadith<\/em>. Would you be kind enough to quote the book wherein Imaam Abu Hanifa had recorded this?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> <em>(Silent)<\/em><\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">The Azaan of Asr was then called out and the Ghair Muqallid got up and started leaving.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb:<\/strong> \u201cJoin us <em>Hanafees<\/em> for one <em>Salaah <\/em>at least. You may by all means recite behind the Imaam if you wish.\u201d<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><strong>Ghair Muqalllid:<\/strong> \u201cI\u2019m in a hurry. I have some important work.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hadhrat Mufti Saheb: \u201cWell then listen to this <em>Hadith <\/em>before you leave. It appears in the narration of Sihah (authentic narrations) that whenever <em>Shaytaan <\/em>hears the <em>Azaan <\/em>he runs away whilst passing wind. (Bukhari, Muslim and Mishkaat)<\/p>\n<p>The furthest distance the voice of the <em>Muazzin <\/em>reaches, all objects within that range be it the stones, sand, etc., will bear testimony for him on the Day of Judgement. <em>Shaytaan <\/em>therefore escapes out of fear that his name will be enlisted amongst those who will intercede for the <em>Muazzin<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, another <em>Hadith <\/em>says:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\" lang=\"en-ZA\">\u0645\u0646 \u062a\u0634\u0628\u0647 \u0628\u0642\u0648\u0645 \u0641\u0647\u0648 \u0645\u0646\u0647\u0645<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\"><em>He who imitates a nation; he will be counted from amongst them (Mishkaat)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Hence, (after hearing the <em>Azaan<\/em>) if you are going to leave in this manner without performing <em>Salaah<\/em>, you will be resembling <em>Shaytaan<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018<em>Awjazul Masaalik<\/em>\u2019 quotes the statement of Imaam Maalik:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn <em>wudhu<\/em>, use your hand to clean your nose. Do not blow your nose in a manner which resembles the snorting of a donkey.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hence you should not resemble <em>Shaytaan <\/em>by leaving without performing <em>Salaah<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en-ZA\">The Ghair Muqalllid left without saying anything.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hadhrat Mufti Mahmood Gangohi (Rahmatullahi Alaih) was conducting a Bukhari Shareef lesson in Kanpur when a person entered and posed a question which was totally unrelated to the lesson.\u00a0Nevertheless the following discussion ensued between Hadhrat Mufti Saheb and the Ghair Muqallid: Ghair Muqallid: What is your personal opinion regarding the mas\u2019ala of Qiraat Khalfal Imaam &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[768,861],"tags":[407,5,23,45,406],"class_list":["post-445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","","category-aqaaid","category-salafism","tag-hadith","tag-imaam","tag-imaam-abu-hanifa","tag-mufti-mahmood-hassan-gangohi","tag-taqleed"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=445"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/445\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":454,"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/445\/revisions\/454"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ihyaauddeen.co.za\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}